9 comments

  • fsh 1 hour ago
    I find the editorialized title misleading. They trapped 17000 atom pairs in an optical lattice and demonstrated a high-fidelity quantum gate between the atoms of each pair in parallel. There is no interaction between the atoms of different pairs and no individual control. The experiment demonstrates a very robust gate scheme, but is a long way from a programmable computer.
    • baxtr 1 hour ago
      With the hype QC these days, I find it hard to separate hype from real progress.
    • progbits 46 minutes ago
      ETHZ news page is always overhyped. There is good research coming from there but their marketing is never worth reading.
      • vasco 29 minutes ago
        What is overhyped about: "A new trick brings stability to quantum operations". Are people complaining about the HN title as if it's the article's title?
    • ionwake 51 minutes ago
      its still more than my nephew managed to achieve this morning
      • TheEaterOfSouls 31 minutes ago
        I have questions. Is he attempting to build a quantum gate array? Seems kind of unfair to compare one person's efforts with a well-established university, if so. :P
  • ForgotMyUUID 0 minutes ago
    “Demonstrates“ vs. “can be applied to 17,000 qubits simultaneously.“ - too completely different things, you know ...
  • nottorp 49 minutes ago
    Judging by the other comments on here, they learned to title their articles from OpenAI and Anthropic.
  • KellyCriterion 44 minutes ago
    And ... can it run Crysis?

    :-D

  • joko42 6 hours ago
    Seems like we are moving from theory to pactice faster than expected.
    • SideQuark 1 hour ago
      This is not a 17000 qubit general computer. Read the paper.
    • adrian_b 3 hours ago
      > “We can now make lots of swap gates with neutral atoms”, says Tilman Esslinger, “but of course we still need a few other ingredients to build a working quantum computer.”
  • adrian_b 3 hours ago
    Non-paywalled research paper:

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22112

  • snthpy 2 hours ago
    For real? I wouldn't have thought so many would be possible so soon. Might actually need to look into quantum computing again after 20 years.
    • SideQuark 1 hour ago
      They did not make a 17000 qubit computer. The qubits were not controllable or general in any way. The paper is linked, look at it.

      This title is misleading.

    • sigmoid10 1 hour ago
      It is still orders of magnitude away from breaking RSA 2048 even under the most optimistic assumptions. And qubits double waaay slower than transistors so far.
  • randomtoast 1 hour ago
    [dead]