6 comments

  • wongarsu 1 hour ago
    The list of 14 rules for running a skunkworks program and how they apply here is great and well worth reading the article, regardless of how you feel about the likelihood of Ford ever successfully executing on a $30k ev truck
  • GreenSalem 45 minutes ago
    Or in most of the civilised world, you can just buy a BYD Shark 6 instead.

    Far superior to American made rubbish.

    One must admit that Jiaqi Liang, senior director of electrical hardware at Ford's Advanced EV team went to Tsinghua University.

    So the Ford design is probably nearly as good as a purely Chinese design.

    The problem is going to be the rubbish American MAGA manufacturing.

    • cbg0 15 minutes ago
      China, being a superpower, has a vested interest in bringing other superpowers down a peg as well as increasing other countries' dependence on China.

      Their state has a serious incentive to ship out cheap cars to destroy the automotive industry in the US and the EU for example. When that happens they can double the price on all their vehicles and you can't restart your car factories to compete with them again until years down the line.

      With Huawei its about telecom equipment which is essential in today's age, with TikTok it's about controlling the narrative, also essential.

      Yes, US and EU manufacturers need to innovate and be less greedy but the cost to make things will always be higher than in China so even though protectionism sounds bad, you'll always have some of that around to even the playing field.

      • seydor 4 minutes ago
        How come this hasn't happened with solar panels, inverters, telecom equipment, batteries etc. It's been a while that such industries in europe have become obsolete
        • cjrp 0 minutes ago
          I guess it's a bit like the nuclear deterrent. The threat of them raising prices or refusing to sell to other countries might be enough.
    • vsgherzi 33 minutes ago
      The US is concerned about Chinese EVs taking over the market. For good reason they’re not happy bad and they’re extremely cheap. I’m no economist nor moralist so I can’t say if banning Chinese evs are the right move or not but I can understand the US wanting to try to create its own market before getting destroyed by the competitor. I don’t think it’s fair to say that speaks to the quality of the US alternatives. There’s plenty of smart people trying to put this together to create affordable domestic electric cars. Personally I applaud that and am happy that competition is getting legacy auto manufacturers to finally make some interesting cars.
      • pepperoni_pizza 2 minutes ago
        Ultimately China and US (and anyone else in the world for that matter) are doing the same thing - helping their domestic industry compete domestically and internationally, because they want prosperity for their country. They do it via different means - China via massive subsidies and US via bans and tariffs, but the end is the same.

        If someone tries to tell you that these are somehow morally different, and one of them is the good guy and the other is the bad guy, they are pushing propaganda, knowingly or unknowingly.

      • graemep 3 minutes ago
        There is a national security and sovereignty issue that the European countries (and others) not facing - its similar to dependence on American clouds etc.

        A lot of these vehicles rely on OTA updates or are controlled through apps. This essentially means the manufacturer controls them. Imagine the consequences if half the vehicles in your country stopped working, or became unsafe? Do you really want to hand this power to a foreign country?

      • GreenSalem 31 minutes ago
        [flagged]
        • vsgherzi 24 minutes ago
          China is definitely a manufacturing powerhouse. But if you think it’s morally superior to the USA I strongly recommend doing some reading. China is an authoritarian nation with extreme censorship as can be seen with the GFW. Criticism of the government is not taken well, LGBTQ content is forbidden, poor treatment of unsupported religions, poor acts of espionage, they have mongered plenty of wars and territory disputes themselves, and have been extremely poor stuwards of their corner of the internet onto the rest of the world.

          China has no legs to stand on in a mortality debate. I’m not exactly of fan of things in the US recently either for the record

          Edit: forgot to mention Taiwan as well as the Hong Kong protests. Recently individuals and an Artist were arrested in China for trying to remember those passed.

          • vsgherzi 18 minutes ago
            Above all I believe in a democratic system where the people’s voices can be heard and we can agree on things together with proper representation. The US definitely dosent always get it right and there’s tons of evidence of this, however I do encourage our effort and hope that one day we can achieve the full foundations of the promises of the US.
          • UltraSane 6 minutes ago
            If the US is shit, then the CCP is shit that has been eaten and puked back up.
        • verve_rat 26 minutes ago
          You know China is busy genociding its Uyghurs population, right?

          Their cars are probably better than US ones, but they are not free of the taint of genocide.

          Edit: and that's not counting their aggressive territorial expansion in the South China Sea and their threats against Taiwan.

          • kaon_2 6 minutes ago
            I don't want to come across as the China pisser because most big countries do scumbag things of have done them (cough colonialism). But some more of China's vices that are out of sight:

            - Keep the war going in Myanmar with terrible results for the population of one of the biggest and most populous countries in the world. You just don't hear about it because no journalist goes there. - Keeping North Korea in the saddle whereas they could have gently pushed for improvements. - Keeping the war in Ukraine going. If Chinese leadership has any moral ambition, they could stop the war quickly. But they don't. Their own agenda comes first, as is the case with any superpower.

            But yes man I would buy a BYD immediatey and it pisses me off to no end that hey are 5x more expensive in Europe than in China. I guess the whole morality of free trade was only 'good' as long as it benefited us.

    • culopatin 20 minutes ago
      Even if objectively one could agree that currently the products from china are better than the US ones, all the “China so good now” stuff is starting to sound like straight up in your face propaganda.
    • ulfw 42 minutes ago
      [flagged]
  • brikym 35 minutes ago
    #15 Don't tell anyone about it.
    • voxadam 24 minutes ago
      Kelly's 15th rule was actually "Starve before doing business with the damned Navy. They don't know what the hell they want and will drive you up a wall before they break either your heart or a more exposed part of your anatomy."
  • iNerdier 1 hour ago
    Who says you need Ford to do it? Aging Wheels tried a prototype of a small electric pickup a year ago from a team making one without the support of a huge car company. I have no dog in this fight, other than wanting more of transport to go electric but if Americans refuse to buy vans which probably make more sense for transporting goods this might be a good option.

    Video: https://youtu.be/1OgN_qctcGs

    • Cthulhu_ 1 hour ago
      You don't need Ford per se, but you do need an experienced manufacturer to take a concept car to mass production, and you need mass production to make something affordable.
      • mft_ 1 hour ago
        I'm watching Slate [0] with interest; they aren't following a path according to your assumptions.

        [0] https://www.slate.auto/en

        • tomrod 56 minutes ago
          They have financial capital via Bezos, I thought?

          Not denigrating them whatsoever, I would like to have one.

          • mft_ 7 minutes ago
            Yes; but they don't (AFAIK) have a track record or pre-existing facilities for car design or manufacturing, per the comment I was replying to.
  • da_chicken 1 hour ago
    Kelly's 14 points are still a great read and should resonate with a lot of people here.

    That said, when they tried this in the past they did it by changing the sticker price to $65k+. So, color me skeptical.

  • jf 1 hour ago
    Slate seems closer to shipping a ~$30k electric pickup: https://www.slate.auto