Coining the phrase “drone terrorism” after a decade-long history of drone strikes with civilian casualties is rich.
You can’t claim terrorism after starting a war that killed 100+ school children on the first day of military strikes. It’s just retaliation as part of the war you started.
Since the 1980's, Iran and Israel have fought an indirect war involving intelligence operations, cyberattacks, assassinations, and Iranian support for armed groups such as Hezbollah.
Their hostility is primarily a consequence of the Islamic Republic's rise.
the Islamic Republic's rise is a consequence of a harsh authoritarian monarchy imposed on Iran by the US and the UK in 1953 (for oil obviously). Your turn.
Because Iran’s prime minister, Mohammad Mosaddegh, nationalized the country’s oil industry, challenging British economic interests.
America, for its part, was increasingly concerned about communist influence during the Cold War, not oil. In fact, its ventures with Saudi Arabia was the cause of the nationalization by Iran’s prime minister, because they felt being taken advantage by Britain.
Are you saying Britain is hence ultimately responsible?
You can’t claim terrorism after starting a war that killed 100+ school children on the first day of military strikes. It’s just retaliation as part of the war you started.
Since the 1980's, Iran and Israel have fought an indirect war involving intelligence operations, cyberattacks, assassinations, and Iranian support for armed groups such as Hezbollah.
Their hostility is primarily a consequence of the Islamic Republic's rise.
Because Iran’s prime minister, Mohammad Mosaddegh, nationalized the country’s oil industry, challenging British economic interests.
America, for its part, was increasingly concerned about communist influence during the Cold War, not oil. In fact, its ventures with Saudi Arabia was the cause of the nationalization by Iran’s prime minister, because they felt being taken advantage by Britain.
Are you saying Britain is hence ultimately responsible?