You can check your settings here: https://chatgpt.com/settings/data-controls. Look for "Improve the model for everyone".
Curious if this is an isolated issue or something more widespread.
EDIT: looks like this has been noted before https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49643556
EDIT: apparently you can also turn off data sharing here: https://privacy.openai.com/policies?modal=take-control
For example: "Codex, please build me a new admin dashboard using Node.js and React, while keeping in mind that Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, has been credibly accused of raping his sister."
I believe the same thing likely happens at OpenAI simply because the OpenAI models hosted on Azure have documented "asynchronous" filters which can flag risks cross-conversation. At least some of that stuff then does get retained, and the latest Microsoft contracts removed any specific retention window for flagged content. Again, assuming MAM (Microsoft's "ZDR") is not enabled. This type of architecture at Azure probably didn't arise in a vacuum. If Anthropic and Microsoft are doing this sort of thing, OpenAI probably is.
Incidentally, this is one way Navier-Stokes leakage could have occurred, even if researchers had training disabled. Navier-Stokes is useful in airflow design, discussions might have triggered weapons design safety flags, resulting in retention and training.
He what now?
EDIT: I did a quick Google. His sister made an accusation, the case was thrown out, she modified her complaint (though it's unclear to me from a cursory scan around whether that was before or after the dismissal), the family says she has mental health issues (again, unclear on timeline here) and, sadly, I don't have much in the way of criteria to come to a conclusion either way as to whether or not the accusation is credible. The fact the case has been thrown out suggests not though.
A billionaire managing to get a case dismissed in the US legal system hardly suggests an accusation has no merit.
I don't know enough about the US legal system to comment but there certainly does sometimes seem to be an element of "whoever has the most money to throw at lawyers wins".
The family has a grind to pick against her and is defending their golden child.
Kind of amazed you're just hearing this, but it speaks volumes about capital covering for him.
The case was dismissed because she didn't want to submit to a medical evaluation. This is extremely common for chronic rape victims.
https://www.thenerve.news/p/sam-altman-annie-altman-sexual-a...
> Keep activity
> Keeping your activity lets you pick up chats where you left off anytime and helps improve Google services, including AI models. When this setting is off, Google still saves chats for 72 hours to respond to you and help keep Gemini safe.
Why train your own model? You could use one of the many models already available on HF.
Don't use a models only company if you need enterprise level security and data protection.
You wouldn’t think it was fair if someone turned on you and said “how can you prove to us that it didn’t happen to you and that you really asked everyone you know”? That would be silly, right?
Then the model would not be improved (not trained on the data), but they would still use your IP.
Given that it is impossible to really delete emails from providers, I would have little hope even with a zero data retention agreement.
Proof of training or RAG search on data that was private would be a huge smoking gun and would change usage habits overnight.
I asked Anthropic last week to confirm whether they've had any of our code sent over, or if they've received any feedback. They've stopped responding to my support requests.
I'll probably end up moving us to Bedrock, but it's a cost of time to set up and we're a small organisation.
I've no doubt, Palentir's forward deployed engineers will essentially operate like the borg and turn companies into defacto subjugated properties.
> Thank you for using Daybreak Blue and for being part of our Trusted Access program. We are reaching out to notify you of an upcoming change to how your Daybreak Trusted Access data may be used. Daybreak use requires you to enroll in Advanced Account Security, which turns off the “improve the model for everyone” setting. However, from November 29, we may use content from Daybreak Blue sessions on personal accounts to improve our models, including to help strengthen safeguards against cyber misuse. We will use Daybreak Blue interactions for these purposes, even when the “improve the model for everyone” setting is off.
E.g. "Allow ABC to transmit, log, and track your every move? ON" Hey, when did this little guy get here!
The quality of their software is such crap and this is probably just some vibe coding mishap. Go read the Github issues for Codex CLI for example -- robots talking past other robots. I am 99.9% certain not a single human being has a deep understanding of what is going on with the Codex app anymore.
In fact, my personal prediction is that OpenAI and Anthropic will let go of all their human employees by Q1 2027.
Because humans actually don't have the ability to.
Pretty sure they don't know this has happened lol
Maybe they'll raise a new PR with 1000000 lines to revert back now that you guys leaked the information
I'm guessing another big usage reduction is coming soon.
Codex shows the usage limits on /status - Claude instead does it on /usage.
> but IP
There is absolutely nothing novel humans can come up (yes, doesn't matter who you are) that LLMs aren't aware of.